Putting the fun back into Parking

The Parking Prankster

Various resources

Transcripts of court judgements

101 A Retailer v Ms B and Ms K.  General running costs of running a security operation cannot be charged on

102 Mayhook v NCP. Referred to by ParkingEye

103 ParkingEye v Somerfield 1st judgement. Referred to by ParkingEye

104 ParkingEye v Somerfield appeal. Judge calls ParkingEye deceitful. Charges owed to landowner, not ParkingEye

105 East Kent Hospitals v Fagan. Only driver is liable. (Now only applies if PoFA conditions not satisfied)

106 CPS v Dorrington. Referred to by ParkingEye. Contractual charge, not breach of contract.

107 UKCPS v Murphy. Pre PoFA 2012. Only driver is liable. (Now only applies if PoFA conditions not satisfied)

108 Excel v Cutts 2012. Signage.